![]() |
ºê·¹ÀÌÅ©´º½º ¹Ú¼ö¿µ ±âÀÚ= Á÷¹« ¿ª·®°ú °ü·Ã ¾ø´Â Áö¿øÀÚÀÇ ¡®¿Ü¸ð¡¯°¡ ä¿ë Æò°¡¿¡¼ ¹èÁ¦µÅ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù´Â »çȸÀû ¿ä±¸°¡ °è¼ÓµÇ°í ÀÖÁö¸¸, ¿©ÀüÈ÷ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡°í ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
20ÀÏ »ç¶÷Àο¡ µû¸£¸é ±â¾÷ 372°³»ç¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¡®Áö¿øÀÚÀÇ ¿Ü¸ð°¡ ä¿ë Æò°¡ ½Ã ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â Áö ¿©ºÎ¡¯¿¡ ´ëÇØ Á¶»çÇÑ °á°ú, Àý¹Ý ÀÌ»ó(55.6%)ÀÌ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ£´Ù°í ´äÇß´Ù.
Æò°¡¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ÀÌÀ¯·Î´Â ¡®ÀÚ±â°ü¸®¸¦ Àß ÇÒ °Í °°¾Æ¼¡¯(55.1%)¸¦ ù ¹øÂ°·Î ²Å¾Ò´Ù. ÀÌ¾î ¡®°í°´, °Å·¡Ã³¿Í ´ë¸é ½Ã À¯¸®ÇÒ °Í °°¾Æ¼¡¯(43%), ¡®´ëÀΰü°è°¡ ¿ø¸¸ÇÒ °Í °°¾Æ¼¡¯(30.4%), ¡®ÀڽۨÀÌ ÀÖÀ» °Í °°¾Æ¼¡¯(21.3%), ¡®±Ù¹« ºÐÀ§±â¿¡ Ȱ·ÂÀ» ÁÙ °Í °°¾Æ¼¡¯(12.6%), ¡®ºÎÁö·±ÇÒ °Í °°¾Æ¼¡¯(12.1%) µîÀ̾ú´Ù.
ä¿ë ½Ã °¡Àå ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ºÎºÐÀ¸·Î´Â ¡®Àλó, Ç¥Á¤ µî ºÐÀ§±â¡¯(87.4%)°¡ 1À§¸¦ Â÷ÁöÇß´Ù. ÀÌ¾î ¡®Ã»°áÇÔ¡¯(45.9%), ¡®¿ÊÂ÷¸²¡¯(30.9%), ¡®Ã¼Çü(¸ö¸Å)¡¯(20.8%), ¡®À̸ñ±¸ºñ¡¯(14.5%), ¡®Çì¾î ½ºÅ¸ÀÏ¡¯(11.6%), ¡®¸ÞÀÌÅ©¾÷¡¯(5.3%) ¼øÀ̾ú´Ù.
ä¿ë ½Ã ¿Ü¸ð¸¦ º¸´Â Á÷¹« ºÐ¾ß´Â ¡®¿µ¾÷/¿µ¾÷°ü¸®¡¯(60.4%°¡ °¡Àå ¸¹¾Ò´Ù. °è¼ÓÇØ¼ ¡®¼ºñ½º¡¯(31.9%), ¡®¸¶ÄÉÆÃ¡¯(24.2%), ¡®±¤°í/È«º¸¡¯(23.7%), ¡®Àλç/Ãѹ«¡¯(23.7%), ¡®±âȹ/Àü·«¡¯(10.6%), ¡®µðÀÚÀΡ¯(8.7%), ¡®À繫/ȸ°è¡¯(8.2%), ¡®IT/Á¤º¸Åë½Å¡¯(5.8%) ¼øÀ̾ú´Ù.
¿Ü¸ðÀÇ ¿µÇâÀ» ´õ ¸¹ÀÌ ¹Þ´Â ¼ºº°·Î´Â ¡®¿©¼º¡¯ÀÌ 26.6%·Î ¡®³²¼º¡¯(6.3%)º¸´Ù 4¹è ÀÌ»ó ¸¹¾Ò´Ù. ¡®Â÷ÀÌ ¾ø´Ù¡¯´Â ÀÀ´äÀº 67.1% ¿´´Ù.
±â¾÷µéÀº ¿Ü¸ð°¡ Áö¿øÀÚÀÇ ´ç¶ô¿¡ Æò±Õ 30% Á¤µµ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ£´Ù°í ´äÇØ ÀûÁö ¾ÊÀº ¼öÁØÀÎ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
¶ÇÇÑ, ½ÇÁ¦·Î ÀÀ´ä ±â¾÷ÀÇ Àý¹Ý(47.3%)Àº ¿Ü¸ð ¶§¹®¿¡ Áö¿øÀÚ¿¡°Ô °¨Á¡À» Áְųª Å»¶ô½ÃŲ °æÇèÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù°í ´äÇß´Ù. ¹Ý´ë·Î ±â¾÷ 3°÷ Áß 1°÷(33.3%)Àº ½ºÆåÀ̳ª ¿ª·®ÀÌ ´Ù¼Ò ºÎÁ·Çصµ ¿Ü¸ð·Î ÀÎÇØ °¡Á¡À» Áְųª ÇհݽÃŲ °æÇèÀÌ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.
¾Æ·¡´Â À§ÀÇ ±ÛÀ» ±¸±Û¹ø¿ªÀÌ ¹ø¿ªÇÑ ¿µ¹®ÀÇ <Àü¹®>ÀÌ´Ù. [Below is an English <Full text> translated by Google Translate.
There is a continuing social demand that the ¡°appearance¡± of applicants, which is not related to job competency, should be excluded from the recruitment evaluation, but it was found that it is still having an impact.
According to Inein on the 20th, a survey of 372 companies on'whether the applicant's appearance affects the job evaluation' was found, and more than half (55.6%) answered that it had an effect.
'Because I think I will be good at self-management' (55.1%) was the first reason that affects the evaluation. Next,'because it would be advantageous to face-to-face with customers and business partners' (43%),'because I think the interpersonal relationship would be smooth' (30.4%),'because I feel confident' (21.3%), 'Because it seems like' (12.6%) and'because I think I will be diligent' (12.1%).
'Impression, facial expression, etc.' (87.4%) ranked first as the most influential part when hiring. Next,'cleanliness' (45.9%),'clothing' (30.9%),'body shape (body)' (20.8%),'features' (14.5%),'hair style' (11.6%),'makeup' ( 5.3%).
'Sales/Sales Management' (60.4%) was the most common job field that looked at when hiring. Continued'Service' (31.9%),'Marketing' (24.2%),'Advertising/PR' (23.7%), and ' Personnel/General Affairs' (23.7%),'Planning/Strategy' (10.6%),'Design' (8.7%),'Financial/Accounting' (8.2%), and'IT/Information Communication' (5.8%).
Among the genders that are more affected by their appearance,'females' accounted for 26.6%, more than four times more than'males' (6.3%). 67.1% answered'there is no difference'.
Companies answered that their appearance had an average of 30% impact on applicants' expectations, which was found to be quite a bit.
In addition, in fact, half of the respondents (47.3%) said they had experience of giving or dropping applicants a penalty because of their appearance. On the contrary, 1 out of 3 companies (33.3%) had the experience of giving or passing additional points due to their appearance even though their specifications or capabilities were somewhat insufficient.