 ▲ 필자/정성태 칼럼니스트/시인. |
이같은 결과는 펜앤마이크 의뢰를 받은 여론조사업체 공정(주)이 지난 6~7일 이틀간 전국 18세 이상 남녀 1015명을 대상으로 실시한 여론조사에 따른 것으로 8일 공표됐다.
용혜인 장관 후보자에 대한 연령대별 임명 반대는 50대에서 가장 낮은 66.5%를 보였으나, 그외 세대에서는 70%를 상회했다. 특히 30대의 임명 반대 응답은 80.9%(찬성 9.2%)를 기록했다.
권역별로는 서울에서 임명 반대가 77.4%로 가장 높았다. 이어 대전·세종·충청 76.7%, 대구·경북 74.6%, 경기·인천 71.3%, 강원·제주 70.7%, 광주·전남북 68.7%, 부산·울산·경남 65.2% 순으로 모든 지역에서 임명 반대가 압도적이었다.
김승원 장관 후보자에 대해서는 30대에서 임명 반대가 가장 높은 69.2%를 보였다. 이어 18세~20대 68.4%, 60대 60.2%, 70세 이상 58.5%, 50대 55.5%, 40대 54.5% 순으로 임명 반대가 높았다.
권역별로는 서울에서 임명 반대가 68.0%로 가장 높은 가운데, 대전·세종·충청 67.0%, 강원·제주 60.7%, 경기·인천 59.2%, 대구·경북 57.9%, 부산·울산·경남 57.8%, 광주·전남북 50.6% 순으로 임명을 반대했다.
차기 대통령 적합도 조사에서는 범여권에서 김민석 14.8%, 정청래 8.4%, 조국 7.3%, 강훈식 7.2% 순이었다. 범야권의 경우에는 오세훈 14.4%, 한동훈 13.5%, 장동혁 10.6% 순이었다. 그외 '없다' 9.2%, '기타 다른 인물/잘 모름' 5.0%였다.
이재명 대통령 국정운영에 대해서는 긍정 34.6%, 부정 62.8%였다. 서울과 30대의 긍정평가는 각각 27.9%와 22.2%에 그쳤다. 이 대통령 핵심 지지 기반인 호남에서도 부정 53.6%로, 긍정 43.8%를 앞섰다. 그외 모든 권역에서 부정이 60%를 웃돌았다.
해당 조사는 구조화된 설문지를 이용한 무선 RDD(100%) 방식의 무선 ARS 전화조사로 진행됐다. 응답률 2.1%, 표본오차는 95% 신뢰수준에 ±3.1%p다. 자세한 사항은 중앙선거여론조사심의위원회 홈페이지를 참조하면 된다.
* 필자 : 정성태(시인/칼럼니스트).
*아래는 위 기사를 '구글 번역'으로 번역한 영문 기사의 [전문]입니다. '구글번역'은 이해도 높이기를 위해 노력하고 있습니다. 영문 번역에 오류가 있을 수 있음을 전제로 합니다.<*The following is [the full text] of the English article translated by 'Google Translate'. 'Google Translate' is working hard to improve understanding. It is assumed that there may be errors in the English translation.>
Opposition to the Appointments of Ministerial Nominees Yong Hye-in and Kim Seung-won Stands at 72.2% and 60.6%, Respectively
- Columnist Jeong Seong-tae
Opposition to the appointments of Yong Hye-in as Minister of Gender Equality and Family and Kim Seung-won as Minister of Justice was recorded at 72.2% (16.6% in favor) and 60.6% (28.0% in favor), respectively. Even in the Honam region—the core support base for the ruling power—opposition to the appointments reached 68.7% (16.3% in favor) and 50.6% (38.2% in favor), respectively.
These results were released on the 8th, based on a public opinion poll conducted over two days (the 6th and 7th) by the polling firm Gongjeong Co., Ltd., commissioned by PenN Mike. The survey covered 1,015 men and women aged 18 or older nationwide.
Regarding nominee Yong Hye-in, opposition to the appointment was lowest among those in their 50s at 66.5%, while it exceeded 70% in all other age groups. Notably, opposition among those in their 30s reached 80.9% (9.2% in favor).
By region, opposition was highest in Seoul at 77.4%. This was followed by Daejeon/Sejong/Chungcheong (76.7%), Daegu/Gyeongbuk (74.6%), Gyeonggi/Incheon (71.3%), Gangwon/Jeju (70.7%), Gwangju/Jeolla (68.7%), and Busan/Ulsan/Gyeongnam (65.2%); opposition was overwhelming across all regions.
For nominee Kim Seung-won, opposition to the appointment was highest among those in their 30s at 69.2%. Opposition to the appointment was highest among those aged 18–29 (68.4%), followed by those in their 60s (60.2%), those aged 70 and older (58.5%), those in their 50s (55.5%), and those in their 40s (54.5%).
By region, opposition to the appointment was highest in Seoul (68.0%), followed by Daejeon/Sejong/Chungcheong (67.0%), Gangwon/Jeju (60.7%), Gyeonggi/Incheon (59.2%), Daegu/Gyeongbuk (57.9%), Busan/Ulsan/Gyeongnam (57.8%), and Gwangju/Jeolla (50.6%).
In a survey regarding suitability for the next presidency, the rankings within the ruling camp were Kim Min-seok (14.8%), Jung Chung-rae (8.4%), Cho Kuk (7.3%), and Kang Hoon-sik (7.2%). Within the opposition camp, the rankings were Oh Se-hoon (14.4%), Han Dong-hoon (13.5%), and Jang Dong-hyuk (10.6%). Additionally, 9.2% selected "none," and 5.0% chose "other/don't know."
Regarding President Lee Jae-myung’s conduct of state affairs, 34.6% gave a positive assessment, while 62.8% gave a negative one. Positive ratings in Seoul and among those in their 30s stood at only 27.9% and 22.2%, respectively. Even in the Honam region—President Lee’s core support base—negative assessments (53.6%) outweighed positive ones (43.8%). In all other regions, negative assessments exceeded 60%.
The survey was conducted using an automated response system (ARS) via mobile phones, utilizing a wireless Random Digit Dialing (RDD) method (100%) and a structured questionnaire. The response rate was 2.1%, and the margin of error was ±3.1 percentage points at a 95% confidence level. For further details, please refer to the website of the National Election Survey Deliberation Commission.
* Author: Jeong Seong-tae (Poet/Columnist)
